if you are making money being dumb and anti fragile, you really don't need to be smart. All being smart will do is make you more fragile.
Contrary to common sense. I believe that a low Reward to Risk is Riskier. People tend to pick pennies in front of steamroller. They think it will give them a chance to succeed where, You actually have 50% chance of going broke with a 1:1 33% with a 2:1, 25% with a 3:1, 20% with a 4:1 ... Etc ... Because you need to be inversely good to succeed. We can control R:R but not how good we are. Therefore a 4:1 gives you more room for error. You only need a P(G)>0,25 with a 4:1. But P(G)>0,5 with a 1:1 ...