i used the word if and the reply was in a humorous way. people like you can only respond with name calling. that reveals your character. people with short fuses always reveal themselves.
Blah Blah Blah Blah. It was the looney's pushing for the tax who were freaking out about said clause yet I have never been able to find a thing about it, would be a pleasent addition to the deal if correct.
"Blah Blah Blah Blah" that is a typical retort when one doesn't have an adequate response but still amusing.
If the clause exists in a legally binding deal then at the very least it forms the basis for a legal case against any implementation, this thread is dead, it used to be about highlighting information but the majority of useful commentators have left and now all we have is people willing to take it onto a personal level, stick your brigde. In the bigger picture since 2011 there has been little progress, if the greedy .... in the eu fail to submit a working plan by new year we can assume they never will, if sander wins all is lost.
i told you it was not personal but you are the one who makes it personal because you have chosen not to control your temper. you put personal insults with each succeeding post. if that is the face you want to present to the world it is your image and your right to do so.
it depends on your definition of the phrase never got on track. it never got out of defazio's committee in congress. yes, there are are thousands of proposals that get bottled up in committee and never see the light of the day but some eventually do come. remember the income tax in the US was not instituted till the 20th century
" A Tax to Curb Excessive Trading Could Be a Boon to Returns" http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/03/y...-could-be-a-boon-to-returns.html?ref=business Please respond in the reader comment section of that article expressing our view of the tax. We need our voice to be heard.
Both mouthpieces pushing this foul agenda are from a certain group. Take a wild guess. And No doubt there will be 'exemptions'. But.. not for you. Senator Bernie Sanders (mother's name Glassberg) Ron Lieber (NY Times owned by Arthur Sulzberger)
The usual drivel from the absolutely clueless followed by a comment section full of envious ridden filth who are alright with it as long as they... I cant remember where the following is from but its the best point to counter the "trading to much is bad mmm k" line.. The tax also distorts major functions of the markets, by punishing markets that reprice in a timely fashion you make wrongly priced assets a sure thing. Markets with a high rate of turn over such as the currency markets are constantly pricing information in, what you call " socially useless transactions" is what in the real world turns out to be creating an efficient market... Imagine for a moment if the illiquid low turn over mortgage derivative market had anything like the transaction rate of the currency markets, those assets would have been repriced far earlier and far more efficiently and would have never become such a danger as to risk the global financial system..