Most of Public and Nearly Half in G.O.P. Back Climate Action

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Jan 30, 2015.

  1. The earth has not even slowed down it's warming. How many times do I have to post this chart before you nitwit deniers get it through your heads?


    [​IMG]
     
    #51     Jan 31, 2015
  2. This is the current best look at the temps. Proven true by multiple studies. On top of this is the CO2 level. Rising CO2 around 1850 caused temps to rise.

    [​IMG]
     
    #52     Jan 31, 2015
  3. wildchild

    wildchild

    Idiot, you claimed that no such claim was made and it clearly was made. Why are you using devices that cause greenhouse emissions anyway. Hypocrite.
     
    #53     Jan 31, 2015
  4. wildchild

    wildchild

    What is the point of this chart? The Earths temp has fluctuated since it has existed. All that this chart proves is that the Earths temp is fluctuating like it always has.
     
    #54     Jan 31, 2015
    iflyjetzzz likes this.

  5. Yes, the earth's temps have fluctuated. What hasn't is the level of stupidity of right wing denier morons.
     
    #55     Jan 31, 2015
  6. I love how the graph mixes their methods of collecting temperatures. Tree rings, corals, ice cores, and historical records. Really? I also love how that graph shows a near constant temperature through 1910 or so. I can unequivocally state that the source of that data has done a lot of 'tricks' to come up with that 'historical' temperature dataset.
    Where's the Medieval Warm Period? Where's the year without a summer (1816)?

    How about that drop in temperature ~1950-1970? Did CO2 levels decrease during that time? No? Then WTF?

    Why weren't thermometer temperature readings used exclusively since, no later than 1750? Daniel Fahrenheit died in 1736 (inventor of the modern thermometer).

    Whoever built that graph used a whole lot of smoothing to come up with the finished product - I wouldn't be surprised if they used something like 50 year smoothing. That's another trick used by the AGW cultists - smoothing datasets over long periods of time.
     
    #56     Jan 31, 2015

  7. If you knew what you were talking about maybe what you are saying would be worth reading.
     
    #57     Jan 31, 2015
  8. ... said the man whom I had to explain the source of the zero line in the stupid ocean heat content graph.


    You want to know why they switched from alternative data to thermometer data when they did? So that they could also discontinue smoothing techniques. The thermometer data has not been smoothed. It's a little game that the person who constructed the graph played to make the data fit his thesis. Show the source of that crap chart.

    Futurecurrents, you are a parrot who is simply repeating others' work. Flawed work at that.
     
    #58     Feb 1, 2015

  9. You did not have to explain anything about that chart. It is obvious what it shows. It shows that the earth/oceans is rapidly gaining heat without pause.

    And the hockey stick chart has been proven true by multiple studies. You are a deluded right wing denier who doesn't have the foggiest idea about climate science. You just have denial.

    Your brain has been manipulated by the Koch bros and friends.
     
    #59     Feb 1, 2015
  10. Wow. Do you need me to repost the posts where the zero line was discussed so everyone can see what a dumb jackass you are? Nah, no need. Everyone knows you're a dumb jackass.

    I find it particularly amusing that you think the much discredited hockey stick graph is real. It's been deconstructed to be shown as a work of fiction. Even the IPCC has run away from the hockey stick graph.

    You, sir, have no brain. How's that carbon footprint of yours doing?
     
    #60     Feb 1, 2015